all levels of government made mistakes and some continue to do so. Just because they havent delst with a crisis it's no excuse to make dumb decisions and beg for forgiveness later.
I understand the point, but here's the dilemma.
It's been really easy for all of us to be the proverbial "arm chair quarterback" through all of this. Scrutinizing and criticizing every move and decision that's been made, we have all done exactly that. Some of the decisions made, maybe we agree with. Others not so much. But the reality is, we aren't the ones in the position to be making these very difficult decisions when they had to be made, and none of us would want to be in that position.
So as the "arm chair quarterback's" that we are, the real questions are "If I had the same information they were presented with, (which we don't) would I have come to the same conclusion based on that available information they had/have and made the same decisions or would I have done something different? What would I have done were I in their position? What would my play have been?" and we can never responsibly answer that because we don't know everything they knew in making these very difficult decisions. We just know how those decisions impacted each of us on a personal level, and the frustrations we have all been feeling as a result.
As arm chair quarter backs, we make our decisions about whether the decisions were right or wrong, not based necessarily on all available facts, but rather on what's been made available to us, which is never everything they know. It's based on what we think, what we believe, and in many ways that's based on our own (political) points of view and opinions, but the reality is, when the play we're scrutinizing and criticizing doesn't exactly go to plan, or we don't like that call in the first place, we base our decisions, what we would have done instead, on incomplete information, (or inaccurate as may be the case, we really don't know) and because we don't know everything they knew or all the information they were presented with that they used to make these decisions, it circles around back to the first question, "If I had the same information they were presented with (which we don't) would I have come to the same conclusion based on that available information they had/have and made the same decisions, or would I have done something different?"
As arm chair quarter backs, that answer is always, I would have done something different based entirely on what we know, not what they knew, because we already know the outcome and result of the play that they made, but we don't know all the information they were given to make that call and that decision, nor would we have wanted to be in THAT position to be the one making that call and that decision under very difficult circumstances, especially if after making that decision, it was considered to be a glaring mistake and had very real life or death consequences. I don't know about anyone else, but I for one would not and do not ever want to be in the position they were in having to make these decisions. They're not robots. They're not perfect. Nobody is. They're human, and humans, even when they have the best of intentions, we do make mistakes, and whether you align with them politically or not, we often forget that especially if we don't like them on a political level.
I don't believe that any politician in this country right now is responding to this as a Liberal, a Conservative or any of the other many political parties to which they may represent of be affiliated. I really do think they've put that aside for now, and that they're working together in ways we've not seen in a very long time and they're just responding as Canadians and ONLY as Canadians. Maybe we should put aside our political points of view and just be Canadians for a while. We might surprise ourselves with just how much we have in common if we were to do that.