can't miss
Well-Known Member
I've always been, not against, but not really a advocate of black powder " Only" hunt zones? To be clear, done it for yrs, early 80's. Buddy's are hard core, so along I follow?
But why not powder or shot gun?
Close to same range, SG gives second shot, less lost game, finishing shot ect? Back in the early yrs of BP, always told to shut up, the tag lottery would fill up if shot guns too, and may not get a tag?
Have asked the MNR same question over the yrs, most common answer is that is what the land owner's want? I don't agree, coming from the rural, most want less crop damage and no hassles. They're not worried if it was BP or SG?
Just wondered what others think?
But why not powder or shot gun?
Close to same range, SG gives second shot, less lost game, finishing shot ect? Back in the early yrs of BP, always told to shut up, the tag lottery would fill up if shot guns too, and may not get a tag?
Have asked the MNR same question over the yrs, most common answer is that is what the land owner's want? I don't agree, coming from the rural, most want less crop damage and no hassles. They're not worried if it was BP or SG?
Just wondered what others think?